“For Those Near, the Miserable Hum of Clean Energy” (NY Times)

Oct 5, 2010

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

—Tom Zeller, Jr, NY Times 10/5/10

·
VINALHAVEN, Me. — Like nearly all of the residents on this island in Penobscot Bay, Art Lindgren and his wife, Cheryl, celebrated the arrival of three giant wind turbines late last year. That was before they were turned on.

“In the first 10 minutes, our jaws dropped to the ground,” Mr. Lindgren said. “Nobody in the area could believe it. They were so loud.”

Now, the Lindgrens, along with a dozen or so neighbors living less than a mile from the $15 million wind facility here, say the industrial whoosh-and-whoop of the 123-foot blades is making life in this otherwise tranquil corner of the island unbearable.

They are among a small but growing number of families and homeowners across the country who say they have learned the hard way that wind power — a clean alternative to electricity from fossil fuels — is not without emissions of its own.

Lawsuits and complaints about turbine noise, vibrations and subsequent lost property value have cropped up in Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Massachusetts, among other states. In one case in DeKalb County, Ill., at least 38 families have sued to have 100 turbines removed from a wind farm there. A judge rejected a motion to dismiss the case in June.

Like the Lindgrens, many of the people complaining the loudest are reluctant converts to the antiwind movement.

“The quality of life that we came here for was quiet,” Mrs. Lindgren said. “You don’t live in a place where you have to take an hour-and-15-minute ferry ride to live next to an industrial park. And that’s where we are right now.”

The wind industry has long been dogged by a vocal minority bearing all manner of complaints about turbines, from routine claims that they ruin the look of pastoral landscapes to more elaborate allegations that they have direct physiological impacts like rapid heart beat, nausea and blurred vision caused by the machines’ ultra-low-frequency sound and vibrations.

For the most extreme claims, there is little independent backing.

Last year, the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group, along with its Canadian counterpart, assembled a panel of doctors and acoustical professionals to examine the potential health impacts of wind turbine noise. In a paper published in December, the panel concluded that “there is no evidence that the audible or sub-audible sounds emitted by wind turbines have any direct adverse physiological effects.”

A separate study financed by the Energy Department concluded late last year that, in aggregate, property values were unaffected by nearby wind turbines.

Numerous studies also suggest that not everyone will be bothered by turbine noise, and that much depends on the context into which the noise is introduced. A previously quiet setting like Vinalhaven is more likely to produce irritated neighbors than, say, a mixed-use suburban setting where ambient noise is already the norm.

Of the 250 new wind farms that have come online in the United States over the last two years, about dozen or so have generated significant noise complaints, according to Jim Cummings, the founder of the Acoustic Ecology Institute, an online clearinghouse for information on sound-related environmental issues.

In the Vinalhaven case, an audio consultant hired by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection determined last month that the 4.5-megawatt facility was, at least on one evening in mid-July when Mr. Lindgren collected sound data, in excess of the state’s nighttime sound limits. The developer of the project, Fox Island Wind, has contested that finding, and negotiations with state regulators are continuing.

In the moonlit woods behind a neighbor’s property on a recent evening, Mr. Lindgren, a retired software engineer, clenched a small flashlight between his teeth and wrestled with a tangle of cables and audio recording equipment he uses to collect sound samples for filing complaints.

At times, the rustle of leaves was all that could be heard. But when the surface wind settled, a throbbing, vaguely jetlike sound cut through the nighttime air. “Right there,” Mr. Lindgren declared. “That would probably be out of compliance.”

Maine, along with many other states, puts a general limit on nighttime noise at 45 decibels — roughly equivalent to the sound of a humming refrigerator. A normal conversation is in the range of 50 to 60 decibels.

In almost all cases, it is not mechanical noise arising from the central gear box or nacelle of a turbine that residents react to, but rather the sound of the blades, which in modern turbines are mammoth steel appendages well over 100 feet long, as they slice through the air.

Turbine noise can be controlled by reducing the rotational speed of the blades. But the turbines on Vinalhaven already operate that way after 7 p.m., and George Baker, the chief executive of Fox Island Wind — a for-profit arm of the island’s electricity co-operative — said that turning the turbines down came at an economic cost.

“The more we do that, the higher goes the price of electricity on the island,” he said.

A common refrain among homeowners grappling with sound issues, however, is that they were not accurately informed about the noise ahead of time. “They told us we wouldn’t hear it, or that it would be masked by the sound of the wind blowing through the trees,” said Sally Wylie, a former schoolteacher down the road from the Lindgrens. “I feel duped.”

Similar conflicts are arising in Canada, Britain and other countries . An appeals court in Rennes, France, recently ordered an eight-turbine wind farm to shut down between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. so residents could get some sleep.

Richard R. James, an acoustic expert hired by residents of Vinalhaven to help them quantify the noise problem, said there was a simpler solution: do not put the turbines so close to where people live.

“It would seem to be time for the wind utility developers to rethink their plans for duplicating these errors and to focus on locating wind turbines in areas where there is a large buffer zone of about a mile and one-quarter between the turbines and people’s homes,” said Mr. James, the principal consultant with E-Coustic Solutions, based in Michigan.

Vinalhaven’s wind farm enjoys support among most residents, from ardent supporters of all clean energy to those who simply say the turbines have reduced their power bills. Deckhands running the ferry sport turbine pins on their hats, and bumper stickers seen on the island declare “Spin, Baby, Spin.”

“The majority of us like them,” said Jeannie Conway, who works at the island’s ferry office.

But that is cold comfort for Mrs. Lindgren and her neighbors, who say their corner of the island will never be the same.

“I remember the sound of silence so palpable, so merciless in its depths, that you could almost feel your heart stop in sympathy,” she said. “Now we are prisoners of sonic effluence. I grieve for the past.”

  1. Comment by Quixote on 10/05/2010 at 8:08 pm

    This underlines the absolute hypocrisy of the Green Movement in stating publicly that “Green Power” such as Wind Turbines will “save the planet”! Instead of arguing and fighting with these thugs trying to make them stop, they should be criminally charged with “attempt to do Bodily Harm” and thrown into prison!

  2. Comment by John Gilbert on 10/06/2010 at 2:08 am

    I live 1 Km east of J. R. on County Road 13 in Prince Edward County (PEC), Ontario. He may be having a wind turbine. It is estimated that about a third of the roughly 25,000 residents are seasonal. We come from the towns and cities for the absolute quiet, away from subtle industral sounds. If J. R. gets turbines it’s all over for tranquility, property values, some wildlife species at risk, and health problems for more than a few.

    My most pleasant times are when I go down to the shoreline and listen in early morning before the small 6 inch waves from Prince Edward Bay break on the rocks and destroy the silence. At fisrt it’s only local birds. Often I hear people talking from their Yachts an incredible 2 Km away, but what is more amazing is a faint sound being channeled across the flat surface of the water from who knows how far – an faint orchestra of hundreds of seagulls. No one bird can be heard only the din of them all. Not unlike the sound of the wind through pines.

    I need to hear from PEC high school students. They have the solution to the wind turbine problem. Students can reach me here – godhas4legs@gmail.com

  3. Comment by Beth Harrington on 10/06/2010 at 3:58 pm

    EVIDENCE ACCUMULATES FOR THE VICTIMS OF
    INDUSTRIAL WIND TURBINES

    First International Symposium on Adverse Health Effects from Wind Turbines

    Ontario, Canada Sept.21, 2010 – A groundbreaking two-day symposium called The Global Wind Industry and Adverse Health Effects: Loss of Social Justice? is about to shed more light on the controversy surrounding the adverse health effects for people living too close to wind turbines.

    This extraordinary gathering of expert speakers from the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada will present important research relating to health issues reported by people around the world living too close to industrial wind developments.

    International experts include Nina Pierpont, M.D., PhD. (U.S.A.), Christopher Hanning, M.D. (U.K.), Michael Nissenbaum, M.D. (U.S.A.), John Harrison, Ph.D. (Can) and Arline Bronzaft, Ph.D. (U.S.A.) who will discuss the adverse effects of wind turbine noise on sleep, impacts on children and urgent need for human health research. Proceedings of the Symposium will be published online.

    Reported Symptoms:
    Chronic Sleep Disturbance, Cardiac Arrhythmia, Hypertensive Episodes, Vertigo, Skin Rash, Nausea, Migraine, Tinnitus, Nosebleeds and Vomiting

    About the Society:
    The Society for Wind Vigilance is an international federation of physicians, engineers and other professionals promoting independent clinical health studies on adverse health effects of wind turbines.

    The Society was formed in response to the growing number of health complaints arising internationally with the arrival of industrial wind developments near homes. The Society is calling for a full, clinical study into these health problems, mitigation of the problems now existing and a moratorium on wind development until these actions have been completed.

    This ‘world first’ will take place at the Waring House Inn and Conference Center, October 29-31, 2010 in Picton, Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada.

The comments are closed.