“Vomited 5 more times by 9 am” (Ontario, Canada)

Mar 28, 2011

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

Editor’s note:  The following is the submission by a man named Paul Thompson to the Australian Federal Senate hearing on the Social & Economic Impacts of Rural Wind Farms.  Mr. Thompson lives across the road from a wind farm substation (power collecting station, which then sends the power on to the grid).  The turbines, themselves, are (I believe) several miles away.  How much of his Wind Turbine Syndrome is owing to the substation and how much to the turbines themselves—I have no idea.

·
—Paul Thompson

I reside in the township of Amaranth in the County of Dufferin in the Province of Ontario, Canada.  I have lived for 5 years (on February 16, 2011) with a Commercial Electrical Substation (T/S) energized 360 meters (1,181 feet) from my home, which provides the provincial grid connection for a 199.5 MW industrial wind turbine facility.

I was born on this “97-acre more or less” rural property 47 years ago and severed off a 1 acre parcel in 1989 and built my current home from the ground up.

I have included excerpts from my daily diary in an attempt to help demonstrate to you the adverse effects imposed on my body by this installation. I have been renting other accommodations to sleep in at night since May 1, 2009, and driving to and from daily, thereby increasing substantially the financial encumbrance and wear and tear on my vehicle and my person.

I have been to my family doctor and have exhausted the headache, tinnitus testing regimen of my physician, including a MRI, CT scan, neurologist and a pain management clinic, etc.

The conclusion reached by the medical profession after all of these tests seems to be that the problem is not with me. The “pain management clinician” told me “this is my shortest diagnosis ever.  You already know what the problem is.  What are going to do to move out?”

The only conclusion I can reach is that it must be the environment I live in. The only change in the environment I live in since my home was built is the installation of the T/S across the road from my property.

An example from my diary of my worst day yet to occur on my property:

» Arrived home at 6 am OK. (I discovered last October what I have been calling OK in my diary for years is just what has become a “normal” amount of adverse effects to me, this I determined after spending two days in a secluded cabin in the woods with electricity.  It is possible, in a “clean” location, to enjoy no ringing in ears at all and not even a slight headache.)

» Wicked ringing in ears on entering house.

» By 6:30 am could easily vomit, wickedly dizzy, nauseous, medium headache, and diarrhea.

» By 6:45am felt really rotten (vomited twice) after having one bite of a waffle for breakfast, which I threw up almost instantly along with a sip of my morning coffee before I left the house for outside (being outside usually helps to alleviate symptoms) at 7 am.

» By 7:30 am condition has worsened.  It is unsafe (extremely dizzy) to drive to leave here, so I lay down in my pickup in the front yard (where I parked it on coming home, unfortunately, between my house and T/S—I had to move very slowly to avoid falling and vomiting) until 12:20pm.

» Vomited 5 more times by 9 am.

» Entered house for lunch (unsuccessful).  Still same symptoms as above except now I have progressed to a wicked headache.

» In house I could hear an “electric motor running” type noise coming from the T/S. (This happens on occasion, may be the low frequency noise aspect affecting my brain?)

» In house until 1 pm.  Struggled outside to truck parked in front yard till 3 pm.  By then felt capable (vision cleared to the point of being able to see and feel well enough to drive around house and shed, hopefully without hitting it) of moving the pickup to back yard out of view of passersby (two visitors came by while parked in front yard; it’s hard to talk when this sick without vomiting) and behind shed hoping, that with the house and my shed behind house blocking “line of sight” to T/S, I might feel better. Stayed there until 7 pm. By then symptoms had backed off to slight headache and medium ringing in ears (almost “normal”).  Other symptoms have backed off as well.

» Entered house.  By 7:20 pm back to medium headache and slight ringing in ears, almost diarrhea, had something to eat (first time today it stayed down) by 9:30pm, when felt semi-safe to drive to leave here—I could easily vomit again.

» By the next morning on awakening at 6am, all is well again.”

An example of a good day:

» Awoke at 6:15 am.  Arrived home at 6:45 am.  Felt OK.

» Instant medium ringing in ears on entering house.

» By 7 am, medium headache started.  In house until 7:45 am.

» Away on service call until 11:40 am.  Felt OK by 10:30 am, on entering house at 11:40am OK until 11:50 am then slight ringing in ears and slight to medium headache started.

» Left house at 12:30 pm on service call.  Away until 7:45 pm. I felt OK by 2 pm. On entering house at 7:45 pm instant medium ringing in ears started and slight to medium headache.

» By 8:40 pm it had progressed to medium ringing in ears and medium headache

» I left house at 9:30 pm.” 

In my opinion the reason this is an example of a relatively good day is the fact I spent less than 4 hours on my property in three batches of time, separated with a “detoxification” period in between.

An example of an average day:

» An average day usually starts out with no issues (OK) while sleeping elsewhere. On entering my home (on many occasions when unlocking the door) I have up to a maximum of 17 minutes in the house, if I’m lucky, before ringing in ears at various intensities and headache at various intensities starts, interspersed on some days with alternating bouts of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, occasional chest tightness (plus stiff, seized limbs, if I spend too much time in the house or sleep here), short-term (new) memory loss.  (Just yesterday, in a restaurant, I had decided what to order and asked the lady with me to order first. By the time she was done ordering chicken fingers and a drink, I had totally forgotten what I wanted to order.  How embarrassing!) This problem [memory loss] seems to linger (based on conversations with people who are no longer exposed and haven’t been for years), and in my case it seems to be getting worse.

In short, I know something bad will happen every day I reside on my property.  The only variables are which symptoms, besides the headache and ringing in ears, how bad, and how long will they last.

I have learned to spend as little time as possible on my property, as it is the only sure way to prevent or alleviate my symptoms.

I have found no “pain killers” that work, and my doctor tried me on many different ones before I discovered the “cure” for my headache was to essentially abandon my property as much as possible.

I have had several persons (some of which had never been on my premises before) visit my home.  Ninety-nine percent of them left in 5 to 30 minutes, either with a feeling of tightness in their chest or a headache, or both.  Some have also experienced the ringing in their ears. All these symptoms dissipate for them within an hour or so of leaving my home, depending on how long they have been visiting.

I also have had on some occasions a severe problem with an audible hum emanating from the T/S (distinctly audible inside the house with doors and windows closed, wearing 27 dB noise reduction rated ear protection).

In my opinion, the reason the hum is such a problem is the fact that the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) decided that a noise level of 40 dBA on the A-scale was an appropriate level for a rural area at night, when in fact, during short term testing at my property by a qualified acoustic consultant at approximately 2 am, the noise level was 16 dBA.  An increase in noise level of 20dBA is accepted as a minimum of a 4-fold increase of the noise level to the human ear—an increase in “power level” of well over 100 times. This is due to the logarithmic scale used to measure noise levels.

Another way of putting this is to quote the wind developers’ mantra:  “40 dBA is no louder than a library or a refrigerator.” The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined that the difference in the noise level between inside and outside a home (even with windows open) will be approximately 15 dBA. According to a noise level comparison chart on the Internet, 0 dBA is regarded as the threshold of hearing, 10 dBA is a sound-proof room, and 20 dBA is the equivalent of a recording studio.

If we factor in my 16 dBA outside, minus WHO’s 15 dBA reduction, I have essentially been forced from a room at almost the threshold of hearing (1 dBA, 9 dBA quieter than a “soundproof” room), to a room in a library with a refrigerator in it when the T/S was first energized. This demonstrates the “flaw” in the audible portion of the MOE noise guideline.

I have tried 3 times to have the guideline revised. All were refused. The guideline also makes no attempt to address low frequency noise, or Infrasound, which I fear may create even larger problems at by these rural installations.

I trust no one reading this submission would willingly accept an increase in the noise level of 4 times as loud to the ear where they attempt to sleep at night. Bear in mind, this could very well be non-stop, 24/7, for potentially the rest of your life, or until you can’t stand it any longer and move away.  Or, as I have been forced to do, rent other accommodations in which to enjoy a night’s sleep with all the attendant expenses thus incurred.

I have attached the decision rendered (September 12, 2008) in my case by the property tax Assessment Review Board (ARB), as an example of the impact of wind development on the municipal tax base and the ratepayer (me). (Thanks to the detriment across the road, I believe my property is not salable.  A clause in the real estate law in this province states you must reveal to a potential buyer any detriments to your property or face legal repercussions.)

This decision represents a 50% loss to the municipality, possibly a complete loss of value to the ratepayer. Since the rendering of this decision, the T/S has been expanded to double its size. I will be appealing once again to the ARB in 2012.

After reading the above letter, ask yourself, How much would you be willing to pay for my property?

The more important question: How many of your fellow residents are you willing to force to endure this situation or one similar, possibly worse, in the name of unproved to really be “green” energy?

 

 

  1. Comment by Steve Bihari on 03/29/2011 at 8:03 am

    So the substation made him sick?

    Editor’s reply: Do you think he was making this up? The question is not asked querulously; it’s genuine. If someone is a Born Again windie, who, by definition, adamantly refuses to confront Wind Turbine Syndrome and instead espouses the risible (laughable) “nocebo” bullshit by Big Wind acousticians—to such a one, the answer is, “Yeah, he’s making this up!”

    In that case, read no further, ’cause we have no conversation on the matter.

    If one replies (and I’m not picking on you, Steve!), “No, he can’t be making this up! There’s gotta be some agency triggering this!”—then we’ve got an interesting conversation underway.

    Once we agree this is not hysteria,we look for the source(s). Two possibilities: substation and turbines. These being the only two novel (new) items in his environment. Plus, his experience matches that of innumerable people around the world—except in his case, he’s literally next door to a substation and some miles (as I recall) from the turbines, themselves.

    Paul Thompson & I have been corresponding for years; I’ve been reading his journal for years. Initially I thought he was too far from the turbines to be affected by them. “It has to be the substation! But, how?”

    Now, with Dr. Laurie’s evidence from Australia (with a caveat, below) and the VIRGO study, “Seismologists say wind turbines produce airborne infrasound plus ground-borne vibration ‘up to 6.8 miles from the wind farm’” (Italy), plus “Infrasound: The hidden annoyance of Industrial Wind Turbines” (France)—the turbines, themselves, are back on the table as possible culprits.

    These studies demonstrate that infrasound travels very far—easily the distance between Paul and the turbines on the horizon.

    If it’s the turbines, much depends on what’s under the ground. That’s why the Italian study by the VIRGO Gravitational Wave Observatory is so intriguing: these guys looked carefully at the composition of the underground geology. Most of us just dismiss that as, “Oh, well, it’s underground! ‘Underground’ is all more or less the same in terms of infrasound/low frequency noise transmission!” Not so!

    Hence, Paul may be living over a geological formation which is especially conducive to powerful ILFN (infrasound & low frequency noise) transmission. I dunno.

    Dr. Laurie, in Australia, is showing ILFN traveling up to 10 km. This is in line with the VIRGO study. In Laurie’s case, as Nina explained to the Australian Federal Senate in her testimony last week, the Coriolis Effect (Force) may be coming into play. Pierpont figured this out, and is working with Dr. Malcolm Swinbanks to see if it makes mathematical sense. If it does, it means that turbines in the Southern Hemisphere (Australia, for instance) will create stronger infrasound than in the Northern Hemisphere.

    Pierpont hopes to publish a short article on this, in these pages.

    So, the turbines are a real possibility.

    But, is the substation also a possibility? I would say, quite possibly so, but as far as I know, no noise engineer has studied this possibility. That is, no noise engineer has actually measured ILFN from substations. (I may be wrong, and it’s been done, and I am simply unaware of it.)

    Is Paul getting ill from EMF from the substation? Dr. Pierpont would say it’s unlikely. Why? ‘Cause the clinical literature on EMF effects is extensive and it does not show anything like what Paul describes. Secondly, EMF, she tells me, even in cases of extreme exposure, does not cause such symptoms—according to the clinical literature.

    In other words, medical doctors immediately recognize the symptoms of WTS as something they’re familiar with—and these docs are called otolaryngologists and neuro-otologists. That is, docs who specialize in disorders of the inner ear. And—this is the important part—they can (and, in some cases, have) figured out the pathophysiology. Whereas Nina tells me that there is no, even remotely clear, pathophysiology for EMF causing WTS symptoms.

    The take home message being, WTS from ILFN makes pathophysiological sense. Eminently so! WTS from EMF makes no pathophysiological sense.

    As an aside, there is an electrical engineer in Canada who talks about “dirty electricity” (which in itself is, literally, nonsense), who argues that EMF causes WTS. Pierpont looked into this person’s claims and dismissed them as “magic beans”—unsupported even by the clinical evidence cited by the engineer. But, then, she’s an electrical engineer, not a clinician. (Pierpont discusses this in her WTS book.)

    Back to the substation. I’m guessing it’s giving off significant infrasound. If we could persuade Rick James to go up to Ontario and measure for it, the mystery would be solved. (Hmm. As I write this, something tells me Rick might have done that, already. Do I vaguely recall Rick writing to me and saying he had measured ILFN from “Paul’s” substation?)

  2. Comment by Barbara Durkin on 03/29/2011 at 9:23 am

    Thank you, Nina and Calvin and Paul Thompson, for bringing this tragic information to our attention. I had once considered that there were tangible benefits extended by wind developers. Now I know differently. Wind energy is community dividing, home-wrecking, and a health, safety and environmental hazard.

    The wind industry is a reminder that corporate social conscience is a Utopian concept. As this is the industry of corporate predators engaged in synergistic corruption. It shares the roots and the business model of Enron. The horror of this new Enron is that we must opt in and we can’t opt out due to government mandates. We are literally funding the destruction of our environment, liberties, freedoms and our health.

    Thank you for your tireless efforts to spread the truth about wind energy.

    ‘In China, the true cost of Britain’s clean, green wind power experiment: Pollution on a disastrous scale’

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

  3. Comment by Bob on 03/29/2011 at 9:25 am

    Yes Rick James did measure sound energy from a sub station. The substation could be a contributing factor with noise production. Clearly as you have outlined above there are other risk factors i.e. the IWT.

The comments are closed.