“Wind Energy: Chalk it up as a loss” (Huffington Post)

Feb 16, 2014

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

bullshit

Editor’s note:  Click here for the video accompanying this editorial.  We’d like to dedicate this piece to Geoff Leventhall and Simon Chapman, two ardent enablers of  wind energy.  The former is a physicist.  The latter, risibly, a sociologist.  Neither seems capable of grasping that wind energy is, through and through — horseshit.  (Yes, this includes the physics of wind energy.)  That it’s absolute horseshit — or worse.  Both men dismiss and, in Chapman’s case at least, openly ridicule Wind Turbine Syndrome.  History will judge them harshly.  That historical reckoning begins with Acheson’s editorial, below.

.
— Ben Acheson, Huffington Post (UK), 2/16/14

Another week, another plethora of news reports attacking wind farms. The latest headlines include; November date for Trump’s wind farm challenge”, “Approval for wind turbines sparks protest at ‘ring of steel'” and “Wind turbines may be killing bats by ‘exploding’ their lungs”, to name but a few. Yet will the stories about Donald Trump, exploding bats and Scotland’s version of the Iron Curtain help to stem the spread of mammoth turbines across our land and seas?

Probably not.

Still, it was only two years ago that anyone who publicly opposed wind turbines was considered a social pariah and practically ostracised from society as if they were modern-day lepers. Things have changed. Not a day goes by without a new story slamming wind energy or highlighting the increasing wind farm opposition across the UK. Just as it was once popular to support wind energy, it has almost — almost — become fashionable to oppose wind turbines.

The problem is that many of the news reports are nothing more than filler. If they are printed on a Tuesday, they are forgotten about by Wednesday; such is the nature of the fast-paced, up-to-the minute, 24-hour news cycle that is available to us. Despite the constant barrage of anti-wind press, the spread of massive industrial wind turbines continues unabated.

In the last year alone we have seen news reports outlining how wind farms have surrounded some of Britain’s most untouched landscape and blighted some of our most bucolic and treasured towns and villages. We have heard horror stories about planning departments ignoring guidelines and forcing homeowners to live next to monstrous whirling steel turbines. We have been warned that property values have plummeted due to the inappropriate placement of wind farms and we have seen hundreds of anti-wind protest groups spring up across the nation, incensed at the lack of democracy in the planning system.

We have read how turbines impact human health and after years of mockery from pro-wind groups, we now have the first peer-reviewed, science-based report confirming that turbines do have harmful impacts on humans.

We have watched videos of turbines exploding in high winds and crashing to the ground in storms. We have witnessed precious habitats and ecosystems torn apart to make way for turbines and we have seen stories about birds being chopped to bits. We have heard how offshore wind farms will destroy precious undersea carbon stores, affect aquatic animals and close important fishing grounds.

We have been told that the tourist industry will be damaged and the golf industry will take a hit. We read explanations of how sailing routes will be impacted and even how Britain’s strategic nuclear deterrent could be hampered. The Ministry of Defence has objected to many wind farms which will affect radar systems and we have even seen how turbines could prevent the detection of secret nuclear weapons tests.

Mountaineers, ramblers, cyclists, equestrians, aviation enthusiasts and bird-watchers have protested. Celebrities have come out to support anti-wind campaigns. Members of every political party, except the Greens, have spoken out against turbines. Over 100 MPs petitioned David Cameron to stop the madness. Members of the European Parliament have repeatedly urged the European Commission to get involved. The Scottish Government has received 10,000 objections from people who oppose wind farms – and that was just for large developments (>50MW).

We have read that schoolchildren are being utilised as pro-wind propaganda tools and we have even seen how the United Nations has ruled that the UK is in breach of international law regarding public participation and the right to receive information in regard to wind farm developments. In the last few weeks, we have heard how IPCC climate change projections, which formed the basis for renewable energy targets, have been called into question by leading scientists.

We have watched as turbines have had to be shut down in high winds and how consumers foot the bill when they are. We have seen their minimal contribution the UK energy supply, even when they are needed most. We have been affected when energy bills have skyrocketed thanks in part to a misguided focus on wind energy. Unfortunately we have also heard how millions of households have been forced into crippling fuel poverty, now having to choose between food and fuel.

We have read about noise abatement orders and residents’ legal challenges. We have seen some communities torn apart by wind farm proposals and others handed bribes in return for their silence. We have read how landowners pocket exorbitant amounts of cash in return for housing turbines and we have seen developers reap vast profits from the UK’s subsidy regime. We have heard how peat bogs have been ripped up and forests torn down to make way for wind farms. We are now being told that wind energy has not made even the slightest difference to carbon emissions.

We have even seen those who peddle ridiculous pro-wind arguments about green jobs debunked and refuted. There is enough credible evidence and enough of an opposition to end a policy of support for industrial wind energy. Yet still we see wind farms popping up all around the country.

Isn’t it about time that we looked at all the evidence cumulatively? Isn’t it about time that we just chalked it up as a loss and tried something else?

.
Ben Acheson is the Energy and Environment Policy Adviser and Parliamentary Assistant to Struan Stevenson MEP at the European Parliament in Brussels. In addition to his expertise on Energy and Environment issues, he has an in-depth knowledge of regional security in Central Asia, animal welfare within the European Union and EU-aspects of the Scottish independence debate. In his spare time, Ben writes for www.thinkscotland.org and plays semi-professional American Football; in 2012 he was unanimously voted as the National Player of the Year in Belgium.

Follow Ben Acheson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@ben_acheson

  1. Comment by sue hobart on 02/16/2014 at 12:29 pm

    . . . but that would mean admitting to a costly mistake… We can’t do THAT!!!!!

  2. Comment by Curt Devlin on 02/16/2014 at 2:40 pm


    To Mr. Acheson’s bill of particulars, I would add that we have seen property rights trampled, property values destroyed, and property owners turned into refugees and forced to flee their beloved homes and farms in the face of the devastation caused by the false Messiah known as wind energy.

    The greatest cost of this failed technology is the human one. This cost is apparently either incomprehensible, or of no concern, to the likes of Chapman, Leventhall, and so many others. I hasten to add Mike Barnard, Dora Mills, and Robert McCunney to the list of the willfully ignorant. There are many others in need of being called out as well. It is amazing how much human suffering some are willing to overlook or ignore if there is a dollar in it for them somewhere.

    Let’s not mince words. The real reason we can’t admit that wind power is a mistake is none other than filthy lucre. Once the noise punishment ends, so will the gravy train. If the money ever stops flowing, you will see the convictions of these so-called proponents disappear like a bad dream. Otherwise, they may actually be held accountable for their actions.

    I predict lots of variations on the theme: “We didn’t know.”

  3. Comment by Marshall Rosenthal on 02/16/2014 at 8:43 pm


    Wind power is a heartless, conniving scheme. Of course it is not supposed to compete with coal or nuclear-fired generating plants. It doesn’t. It is only supposed to make money. Wind companies sell renewable energy tax credits to the “nasty guys”, so that the “nasty guys” can continue to make money, hand over fist, selling us “dirty” energy.

    It’s particularly heartless because the industry has known since the 1980’s that not only does it not work, it destroys people’s ability to live near them. It’s very heartless when the pols allow themselves to be seduced by the industry and either lie to or ignore the victims who have been creamed by the wind turbines.

    Isn’t it time we stopped this bullshit, before it actually destroys us?

The comments are closed.